Since I have concluded finishing my literary narrative I was asked to answer questions about taking stock in my work. This is what I have come up with: I think that I told the story marginally well or at least to the best of my ability, as my memory would serve me. I got my point across of knowing that literature does not have a designated mode. Something I did especially well was to give the audience the vibe of the class the way that it felt to me. However, something that could of been improved is giving more detail or including more dialogue.
Anyway, I came up with ideas and generating text by just basically free writing and getting all of my ideas on paper or on the screen as the case may be. Then one idea would just lead into the other creating basically the body for my paper. To draft my narrative, however, I basically took my free write and just adapted it to the paper's format.
Although I did not use photographs or graphics I did not think that they were important or that they would of essentially contributed to anything in my paper that I did not already describe to the audience.
The responses that I received influenced my paper greatly because when I write my ideas or my thoughts they may flow and make sense to me, but not always to others. Also, I am usually pretty bad at fragments and punctuation part of writing so if I have responses, corrections, or just some one's ideas to make my paper better they are always and sincerely welcome.
All in all, next time I would probably use more dialogue to make it seem more real or to give the reader a better sense of the situation. Also, I would be more descriptive to make the narrative more detailed for the audience.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment